Frequently Asked Questions
These questions address common governance and audit-readiness concerns prior to engagement.
1. Who founded Permission Six Reclamation Systems Enterprise LLC (P6RSE), and what is its focus?
Permission Six Reclamation Systems Enterprise LLC (P6RSE) was founded by George A. Ritter. The firm focuses on governance operations, continuity architecture, and evidence-producing systems designed to operate under oversight and audit conditions. Its work emphasizes clarity, control, and defensible execution rather than advisory theory.
2. What problem does P6RSE solve that traditional compliance or consulting does not?
P6RSE addresses the gap between written requirements and real execution. Many organizations have policies and standards but lack operational systems that enforce scope, control change, and produce evidence as work occurs. P6RSE builds governance that functions in practice and remains defensible over time.
3. What is AI Governance Operations Standards (AiGOS)?
AiGOS is a deployable governance operations standard developed by P6RSE for AI-enabled systems. It defines minimum control artifacts, lifecycle governance, and change discipline so AI work remains reviewable, auditable, and resilient as models, data, and tools evolve.
4. How does AiGOS help organizations remain audit-ready while using AI?
AiGOS embeds governance directly into AI operations. It establishes clear boundaries, enforces controlled change, and generates evidence by default. This allows teams to innovate while maintaining documentation and traceability suitable for internal review and external audit.
5. What is Continuity & Evidence Governance?
Continuity & Evidence Governance is P6RSE’s approach to preserving operational integrity across time, personnel changes, and modernization cycles. It ensures decisions, controls, and changes remain traceable and verifiable without relying on informal knowledge or individual memory.
6. How does Continuity & Evidence Governance differ from recordkeeping or documentation?
Recordkeeping captures information after the fact. Continuity & Evidence Governance structures how information is created, controlled, and validated during execution. This approach maintains chain-of-custody posture and ensures evidence remains meaningful and defensible.
7. How does P6RSE prevent governance drift over time?
P6RSE prevents drift by defining explicit scope boundaries and enforcing formal change control. Changes are documented, reviewed, and traceable, which prevents gradual erosion of controls and keeps operations aligned with their original intent.
8. Are P6RSE’s governance systems designed for real audits and oversight reviews?
Yes. P6RSE designs governance systems to be reviewed by oversight bodies, auditors, and internal review teams. The systems emphasize clarity, evidence integrity, and repeatability so organizations can respond confidently to inquiries without reactive reconstruction.
9. Who benefits most from engaging P6RSE?
P6RSE is most effective for organizations operating in regulated, high-accountability, or emerging-technology environments. This includes prime contractors, mission partners, and teams responsible for systems that must remain defensible under scrutiny.
10. Does P6RSE replace existing compliance programs or internal teams?
No. P6RSE complements existing programs and teams. Its role is to strengthen operational governance, close execution gaps, and provide structure that existing personnel can sustain rather than replace.
11. How does P6RSE approach change requests or governance modifications?
P6RSE treats changes as governed events. Modifications are evaluated, documented, and approved before implementation to preserve continuity and evidence integrity. Uncontrolled or undocumented changes are intentionally avoided.
12. How can P6RSE’s capabilities be verified?
P6RSE maintains public verification through federal registries. Links to SAM.gov and SBA Dynamic Small Business Search (DSBS) profiles are available in the site footer for independent confirmation.
Permission Six – Recommended Dialogue Openers
For the P6TTE-Public Evidence Retrieval Interface
Use the following prompts to explore how Permission Six approaches AI governance, evidence integrity, and oversight-ready system design. These questions are designed to surface structure, boundaries, and intent—not speculation or opinion.
Recommended starters:
What does ‘governance-first AI’ actually mean in practice?
What problem is P6_OSSERAIS designed to solve?
How can oversight bodies ‘talk to the evidence’ instead of requesting it?
Why does P6 separate public, operator, and behind-glass access?
What is the Control → Artifact → Hash → Receipt retrieval model?
What makes an evidence archive audit-ready by default?
How does P6 prevent AI hallucination at the system design level?
How does P6 support self-service oversight without expanding scope?
How does P6 maintain chain-of-custody without manual handling?
Why is evidence population separated from system structure?
When would controlled access be required?
What is Behind-Glass access, conceptually?
Note: P6TTE-Public provides conceptual, governance-safe explanations only.
It does not access internal systems, operate on real evidence, or provide determinations.